Seriously, just do it already.
The 720p 2 Mbit/s was set probably like a decade ago and it’s now 2022, what’s stopping you?
Years of frustration fixed by changing one line of code.
“Hey, please change your resolution in the settings” “How do I do that?” Every single time.
Just change it.
We had a weird issue with the site and API search so we’re currently rebuilding the search indexes, might take up to 2h.
Until then the site and API are down in “maintenance mode”.
Apologies.
[EDIT] Rebuilding the indexes is REALLY slow for some reason so it might take a bit longer.
[EDIT 2] Might have fixed the slowness. Might be finished in 30 mins now. (15:15 UTC)
[EDIT 3] We’re back online at of 15:30 UTC.
I pretty obsessively check this subreddit, and I don’t know why. I don’t actually download things that often anyways (my SABnzbd server is actually offline, so I can’t even look at how much data I’ve downloaded in the past year, but I’m betting it’s under 2TB). I just want to collect.
I guess I’m not quite as dedicated as /u/weirdbanana but I do get their vibe
Name | BackBone | Data | Price | Price/TB | SABnzbd Priority | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EasyNews | Omicron | Unlimited | $36/year | N/A | 0 | I’d like to support one of the smaller providers, so I think I’ll be switching this when it expires. Hopefully I can wait to BF to snag something cheaper |
UseNight | Abavia | Unlimited | $22/year | N/A | 1 | I just wanted something on Abavia, and I didn’t go with the €36/6TB BulkNews deal since their twitter has been inactive for 18 months |
NewsGroupDirect | UsenetExpress | 500GB | $1.50 | $3 | 2 | BF Flash Sale, and I like supporting the “more independent” providers like … |
I purchased 6 months of subscription before putting much thought of it but lately I find the site painfully slow most of the time. Do you guys also experience this or is it just me? It is dreadfully slower than NZB Finder or any onther indexer I use.
Weekend Block Sale!
500GB Block for $7.00 No code necessary. On sale from $12.00
Order Directly: https://usenetfire.com/signup/64
The Low Down:
Thanks all and keep a heads up for on-going news and exciting things to come with Usenetfire.
Feeling like a huge idiot right now for missing this joke lmao
We know, there are a few shows that have their metadata screwed up. There is currently a hiccup in the tvdb api, which is causing skyhook to freak out.
It will be solved soon. Just trying to prevent some threads for this issue that we’re aware of. Thanks!
6pm ET EDIT: This is an issue on TVDB, not Sonarr or Skyhook. There are multiple tickets in to TVDB at the moment, trying to get them to fix their stuff. It appears to be slowly impacting nearly everything, so I’m going to stop tracking specific series here.
Shows we’re aware of that are broken so far:
I’m very new to configuring Sonarr to this level.
Once an episode releases, I want Sonarr to grab the first 1080p release regardless of size. Then after like a week, I want it to search for the episode again but download an x265 1080p version to reduce the size. How can I set up profiles and qualities to do this?
Bonus points for having different settings for sitcoms, animation, and modern drama/sci-fi, as they all benefit from different levels of compression.
I realize this could be done with something like MP4 Automator but I have more Internet speed than hardware conversion power, so downloading is a lot faster than converting, especially with x265.
I have been running a linux based media server for a long time now but it is getting a bit long in the tooth.
Just setting up a new one with Radarr, Sonarr etc and I am wondering whether or not I should bother with Docker on the new machine?
The old one ran (and still runs) everything fine without it but most of the setups I read about now seem to use Docker.
Baring in mind I know very little about Docker and what I have read confused the hell out of me, is it worth taking the time to learn about it and set it up?
I keep seeing this behavior that I can’t explain. Here is a table that demonstrates;
|Title|Format| |:-|:-| |Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.2014.IMAX.2160p.DSNP.WEB-DL.x265.10bit.HDR.DTS-HD.MA.TrueHD.7.1.Atmos-SWTYBLZ|HDR| |Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.2014.1080p.BluRay.x264.TrueHD.7.1.Atmos-SWTYBLZ|TrueHD ATMOS| |Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.2014.1080p.IMAX.BluRay.REMUX.AVC.DTS-HD.MA.7.1-RARBG|LQ, DTS-HD MA, IMAX| |Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.2014.2160p.UHD.BluRay.X265.10bit.HDR.TrueHD.7.1.Atmos-AViATOR|HDR, TrueHD ATMOS|
Why wouldn’t the 1st row above have “IMAX, TrueHD ATMOS, or DTS-HD MA” listed and included in its score? These are all from the same indexer (rarbg via prowlarr). They have the same title structure.
The only plausible explanation I can come up with is that it can’t handle the fact both TrueHD and DTS-HD MA are in the title? But even then I don’t get why it ignores IMAX as well, but picks up HDR.
This is using all the recommended TRaSH custom …